Access to essential anticancer medicines for children and adolescents in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Essential anticancer medicines are an indispensable component of multidisciplinary treatment of paediatric malignancies. A European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) study reported inequalities in the availability of anticancer medicines for adult solid tumours and provided a model for the present survey. The aim of this survey was to assess the accessibility of essential medicines used in paediatric cancer patients aged 0 to 18 years across Europe from 2016 to 2018. METHODS: A list of medicines was drawn with input from the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP Europe) Clinical Research Council referring to the World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines for Children (WHO EMLc) 2017. A survey was sent to nominated national clinician and pharmacist rapporteurs and parent associations in up to 37 countries; answers were obtained from 34 countries. RESULTS: The full survey list contained 68 medicines, including 24 on the WHO EMLc 2017. Health professionals reported that 35% of all medicines were prescribed off-label in at least one country and that 44% were always available in >90% of countries. Only 63% of the EMLc 2017 medicines were reported as always available. The main determinant of unavailability was shortages, reported for 72% of medicines in at least one country. Out-of-pocket costs were reported in eight countries. Twenty-seven percent of orally administered medicines were never available in child-friendly formulations. Parents detailed individual efforts and challenges of facilitating ingestion of oral medicines as prescribed. Inequalities in access to pain control during procedures were reported by parents across Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents with cancer in Europe experience lack of access to essential medicines. Urgent actions are needed to address shortages, financial accessibility, availability of safe age-appropriate oral formulations, and pain management across Europe.

Crizotinib in c-MET- or ROS1-positive NSCLC: results of the AcSé phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: In 2013, the French National Cancer Institute initiated the AcSé program to provide patients with secure access to targeted therapies outside of their marketed approvals. Efficacy and safety was then assessed using a two-stage Simon phase II trial design. When the study design was designed, crizotinib was approved only as monotherapy for adults with anaplastic lymphoma kinase plus non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced NSCLC patients with c-MET ≥6 copies, c-MET-mutated, or ROS-1-translocated tumours were enrolled in one of the three cohorts. Patients were treated with crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. Efficacy was assessed using the objective response rate (ORR) after two cycles of crizotinib as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included disease control rate at four cycles, best ORR, progression-free survival, overall survival, and drug tolerance. RESULTS: From August 2013 to March 2018, 5606 patients had their tumour tested for crizotinib targeted molecular alterations: 252 patients had c-MET ≥6 copies, 74 c-MET-mutation, and 78 ROS-1-translocated tumour. Finally, 25 patients in the c-MET ≥6 copies cohort, 28 in the c-MET-mutation cohort, and 37 in the ROS-1-translocation cohort were treated in the phase II trial. The ORR was 16% in the c-MET ≥6 copies cohort, 10.7% in the mutated, and 47.2% in the ROS-1 cohort. The best ORR during treatment was 32% in the c-MET-≥6 copies cohort, 36% in the c-MET-mutated, and 69.4% in the ROS-1-translocation cohort. Safety data were consistent with that previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: Crizotinib activity in patients with ROS1-translocated tumours was confirmed. In the c-MET-mutation and c-MET ≥6 copies cohorts, despite insufficient ORR after two cycles of crizotinib, there are signs of late response not sufficient to justify the development of crizotinib in this indication. The continued targeting of c-MET with innovative therapies appears justified. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02034981.

Evaluation of the Implementation of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria in the HERBY Trial of Pediatric Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: HERBY was a Phase II multicenter trial setup to establish the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to radiation therapy and temozolomide in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed non-brain stem high-grade gliomas. This study evaluates the implementation of the radiologic aspects of HERBY. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed multimodal imaging compliance rates and scan quality for participating sites, adjudication rates and reading times for the central review process, the influence of different Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria in the final response, the incidence of pseudoprogression, and the benefit of incorporating multimodal imaging into the decision process. RESULTS: Multimodal imaging compliance rates were the following: diffusion, 82%; perfusion, 60%; and spectroscopy, 48%. Neuroradiologists' responses differed for 50% of scans, requiring adjudication, with a total average reading time per patient of approximately 3 hours. Pseudoprogression occurred in 10/116 (9%) cases, 8 in the radiation therapy/temozolomide arm and 2 in the bevacizumab arm (P < .01). Increased target enhancing lesion diameter was a reason for progression in 8/86 cases (9.3%) but never the only radiologic or clinical reason. Event-free survival was predicted earlier in 5/86 (5.8%) patients by multimodal imaging (diffusion, n = 4; perfusion, n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of multimodal imaging to the response criteria modified the assessment in a small number of cases, determining progression earlier than structural imaging alone. Increased target lesion diameter, accounting for a large proportion of reading time, was never the only reason to designate disease progression.

[Multidisciplinarity, education, and training in pediatric oncology-hematology]. / Multidisciplinarité et formation des spécialistes à l'oncologie et à l'hématologie maligne pédiatrique.

INTRODUCTION: According to the European Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOPE) standard of care guidelines, high-quality care of children and adolescents with cancer needs to be delivered by well-trained multidisciplinary teams in specialist centers working with designated shared-care local centers in a so-called hub-and-spoke model. The Diplôme Inter-Universitaire d'Oncologie Pédiatrique (DIUOP) is the only European training program in pediatric oncology in French for all physicians involved in care of patients with pediatric malignancies. In agreement with the SIOPE syllabus, the DIUOP is composed of training courses (120h), on-site practical training in a specialist center, and a research project to be defended before an examining board. METHOD: All graduates received a questionnaire to describe their current professional position. A comprehensive PubMed analysis retrieved all papers published form DIUOP research projects. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2011, 290 physicians were trained: 242 pediatricians, 21 surgeons, and 19 radiation therapists. Eight had another specialty including imaging, hematology, and pathology. Ninety-two were initially trained outside of France: 50% in Europe (mainly in Italy, Belgium, and Switzerland), 42% in Africa and the Middle East, and 8% in South America. Of the 266 graduates, 74% answered the questionnaire, and 90% of them take care of children and adolescents with cancer. Sixty-nine articles, i.e., one out of four research projects, were published in 34 journals with a median impact factor of 3.5 (0-22.6), 85% in English. CONCLUSION: DIUOP is the only French-speaking European education program providing a high-quality, professionalizing, and comprehensive multidisciplinary training program for French and international specialists taking care of children and adolescents with cancer.

Busulfan pharmacokinetics following intravenous and oral dosing regimens in children receiving high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma as part of the HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial.

INTRODUCTION: Busulfan is widely used in a neuroblastoma setting, with several studies reporting marked inter-patient variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The current study reports on the pharmacokinetics of oral versus intravenous (IV) busulfan in high-risk neuroblastoma patients treated on the European HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN study. METHODS: Busulfan was administered four times daily for 4 days to children aged 0.7-13.1 years, either orally (1.45-1.55 mg/kg) or by the IV route (0.8-1.2mg/kg according to body weight strata). Blood samples were obtained prior to administration, 2, 4, and 6h after the start of administration on dose 1. Busulfan analysis was carried out by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and data analysed using a NONMEM population pharmacokinetic approach. RESULTS: Busulfan plasma concentrations obtained from 38 patients receiving IV busulfan and 25 patients receiving oral busulfan, were fitted simultaneously using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Lower variability in drug exposure was observed following IV administration, with a mean busulfan area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of 1146 ± 187 µM.min (range 838-1622), as compared to 953 ± 290 µM.min (range 434-1427) following oral busulfan. A total of 87% of children treated with IV busulfan achieved AUC values within the target of 900-1500 µM.min versus 56% of patients following oral busulfan. Busulfan AUC values were significantly higher in HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial patients who experienced hepatic toxicity or veno-occlusive disease (VOD) (1177 ± 189 µM.min versus 913 ± 256 µM.min; p=0.0086). Further stratification based on route of administration suggested that the incidence of hepatic toxicity was related to both high busulfan AUC and oral drug administration. CONCLUSION: The reduced pharmacokinetic variability and improved control of busulfan AUC observed following IV administration support its utility within the ongoing HR-NBL-1/SIOPEN trial.

Dose-finding designs in pediatric phase I clinical trials: comparison by simulations in a realistic timeline framework.

OBJECTIVE: Usual dose-finding methods in oncology are sequential. Accrual is suspended after each group of patients to assess toxicity before increasing the dose. An adapted Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) and Rolling 6 (R6) method, designed to avoid this suspension of accrual in pediatric oncology, are compared with the traditional 3+3 design. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The competing performances were evaluated in a simulation study integrating the temporal dimension, and a phase I trial was reanalyzed. We compared methods for various interpatient arrival times and dose-toxicity relations, in terms of distribution of final recommendations, number of skipped children and duration of trials. RESULTS: R6 and CRM can be safely implemented to limit trial suspensions, especially when mean interpatient arrival time is short. CRM was found to be more efficient than algorithm-based methods (44% of good recommendations vs. 38%) but moderately increased the risk of overtreatment. The R6 design included more patients at suboptimal doses. The design with the shortest study duration depended on the number of dose to escalate before the target. CONCLUSION: These new methods can reduce the number of skipped patients, but only provide limited gain in terms of ability to select the right dose. New designs are needed.

The state of research into children with cancer across Europe: new policies for a new decade.

Overcoming childhood cancers is critically dependent on the state of research. Understanding how, with whom and what the research community is doing with childhood cancers is essential for ensuring the evidence-based policies at national and European level to support children, their families and researchers. As part of the European Union funded EUROCANCERCOMS project to study and integrate cancer communications across Europe, we have carried out new research into the state of research in childhood cancers. We are very grateful for all the support we have received from colleagues in the European paediatric oncology community, and in particular from Edel Fitzgerald and Samira Essiaf from the SIOP Europe office. This report and the evidence-based policies that arise from it come at a important junction for Europe and its Member States. They provide a timely reminder that research into childhood cancers is critical and needs sustainable long-term support.

[Potential role of antiangiogenic treatment in neuroblastoma]. / Neuroblastome : intérêt des traitements anti-angiogéniques.

Focus on new drug development over the last few years has yielded new agents that differ from unspecific classical chemotherapeutics and ionizing radiation, while still targeting the cancer cell itself. Antiangiogenesis is a totally distinct approach targeting the tumor's blood vessels. This concept has now found its eligibility for the treatment of several adult solid tumors: the human antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab, as well as the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, sunitinib and sorafinib, have recently been licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) for the treatment of colorectal, renal, and lung cancer. Other antiangiogenic drugs are under preclinical and early clinical evaluation. However, what do we know of the use of these drugs in pediatric solid tumors, such as sarcomas and embryonal and neuronal tumors? For some time now, neuroblastoma has been shown to be dependent on angiogenesis. However, the first preclinical data on antiangiogenic drugs in neuroblastoma have not been published until recently, and clinical trials with antiangiogenic agents in neuroblastoma treatment protocols are scarce. This review adresses current knowledge on the important role and mechanisms of angiogenesis in neuroblastoma and summarizes available preclinical and clinical results of antiangiogenic agents used to treat neuroblastoma. Our review clearly demonstrates that clinical trials are urgently needed to bring forward promising antiangiogenesis concepts in neuroblastoma therapy.

Treatment outcome and survival in participants of phase I oncology trials carried out from 2003 to 2006 at Institut Gustave Roussy.

BACKGROUND: The oncology community usually perceives phase I oncology trials as associated with poor or limited benefits and substantial risks. There is scarce data concerning outcome and survival of patients enrolled in current phase I oncology trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all phase I oncology trials conducted by investigators from the Adult Phase I Unit at Institut Gustave Roussy from 2003 to 2006. We report data concerning patient demographics, treatment outcome, toxicity, survival and type of care after trial exit. RESULTS: We analyzed 10 trials involving 180 participants. The overall response rate was 7.2%. Disease control (objective response plus stable disease) was achieved in 48.2% of patients. The rate of toxic death was 0.5%. In all, 38% of patients had at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 toxic events. The median progression-free survival and the median overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 8.7 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a time between diagnosis of disease and inclusion in the phase I trial > or =24 months and evidence of disease control were statistically significant predictors of improved OS. CONCLUSION: Current phase I oncology trials are safe and are associated with clinical benefit in a substantial proportion of patients.

Prospective validation of a novel IV busulfan fixed dosing for paediatric patients to improve therapeutic AUC targeting without drug monitoring.

INTRODUCTION: Oral busulfan clearance is age-dependent and children experience a wide variability in plasma exposure. BSA- or age-based dosing is used with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to reduce this variability. PURPOSE: A new intravenous (IV) dosing of busulfan (Bu) based on body weight, designed to improve AUC targeting without TDM and dose-adjustment, was prospectively evaluated. METHOD: Bu was administered as a 2 h IV infusion every 6 h over 4 days (16 administrations). Five dose levels were defined on body weight as follows: 1.0 mg/kg for <9 kg; 1.2 mg/kg for 9 to <16 kg; 1.1 mg/kg for 16-23 kg; 0.95 mg/kg for >23-34 kg; 0.80 mg/kg for >34 kg. Bu treatment was followed by Cyclophosphamide or Melphalan prior to allogeneic or autologous transplantation in 55 children aged 0.3-17.2 years (median 5.6 years). RESULTS: No difference in AUC values was observed between weight strata (mean +/- SD 1248 +/- 205 micromol.min), whereas a significant difference in Bu clearance was demonstrated. This new dosing enabled to achieve a mean exposure comparable to that in adults. At dose 1, 91% of patients achieved the targeted AUC range (900-1500 micromol.min) while no patients were underexposed. At doses 9 and 13, over 75% of patients remained within that target whilst most of the others were slightly above. Successful engraftment was achieved in all patients. In conclusion, from infants to adults this new dosing enabled, without TDM and dose adjustment, to successfully target a therapeutic AUC window.

[Translational research and Cancer Plan]. / Recherche translationnelle et plan Cancer.

The French Cancer Plan 2003-2007 has made translational research central to its research programme, to ensure the care-research continuum and the quickest application possible for the most recent discoveries, for the patients' benefit. This is a new field of research, still little-known or ill-understood. A working group, composed of physicians and researchers from academic research and industrial research, sought to define translational research in cancerology and define the issues at stake in it. Translational research needs to develop in close connection with the patients in order to enable a bi-directional flow of knowledge from cognitive research toward medical applications and from observations made on patients toward cognitive research. Placed under the aegis of the French National Cancer Institute and Leem Research, the group has put forth a strategy for implementing translational research in cancerology in France to make it attractive, competitive and efficient and to foster the development of public-private partnerships.

Dose finding study of oral PSC 833 combined with weekly intravenous etoposide in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumours.

PSC 833 is an effective MDR1 reversal agent in vitro, including studies with paediatric cancer cell lines such as neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. This study was performed to determine the safety profile, dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in children with solid tumours and to determine the influence of PSC 833 on the pharmacokinetics of co-administered etoposide. Each patient received one cycle of intravenous etoposide (100 mg/m2 daily for 3 days on three consecutive weeks) to document baseline pharmacokinetics, and subsequently the same schedule using a dose of 50 mg/m2 was given combined with PSC 833 given orally every 6h at a starting dose of 4 mg/kg. Thirty two eligible patients (23 male, median age 8.3 years) were enrolled. Neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma were the common disease types. Brain tumours were excluded. DLT was defined as any non-haematological grade 3-4 toxicity (common toxicity criteria) and using a specific toxicity scale for cerebellar toxicity. The MDT was defined as the first dose below which 2 or more patients per dose level experienced DLT. Grade 1-2 ataxia occurred in cohorts 2 and 3 (4 and 5 mg/kg, respectively). Three patients developed grade 3 neurotoxicity in the 6 mg/kg cohort and this defined the MTD. Six responses were observed (2 CR, 4 PR). Pharmacokinetic studies indicated that the clearance of etoposide was reduced by approximately 50% when combined with PSC 833. It is concluded that the toxicity profile and MDT is similar in both children and adults, as is the effect on etoposide metabolism. The study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of carrying out a paediatric phase 1 trial across European boundaries and acts as a model for future cooperative studies in rare cancers among children.

Elevated plasma ferritin and busulfan pharmacodynamics during high-dose chemotherapy regimens in children with malignant solid tumors.

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD) is a frequent complication during hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). A strong relationship has been demonstrated between busulfan exposure and HVOD for busulfan-cyclophosphamide and allogeneic HSCT in adults. Busulfan disposition after the first intake was studied in 77 children treated for solid malignancies with high-dose busulfan-containing regimens and autologous HSCT. Busulfan was combined with cyclophosphamide and melphalan (n=30), melphalan (n=27), and thiotepa (n=20). No relationship was observed between busulfan exposure and HVOD. In contrast, plasma ferritin at baseline was higher in patients with HVOD (750 ng/ml (20-3,110)) compared with those without HVOD (189 ng/ml (8-3,967), P=0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that a ferritin level exceeding 300 ng/ml was the only risk factor for HVOD with an odds ratio of 4.0 (confidence interval 95% (1.5-11.2), P=0.0071). A high ferritin level at baseline was explained by the diagnosis of neuroblastoma, related treatments and transfusions.

A phase I study of intravenous liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome) in paediatric patients with relapsed or resistant solid tumours.

Anthracyclines are widely used in paediatric oncology, but their use is limited by the risk of cumulative cardiac toxicity. Encapsulating anthracyclines in liposomes may reduce cardiac toxicity and possibly increase drug availability to tumours. A phase I study in paediatric patients was designed to establish the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) after a single course of liposomal daunorubicin, 'DaunoXome', as a 1 h infusion on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Patients were stratified into two groups according to prior treatment: Group A (conventional) and group B (heavily pretreated patients). Dose limiting toxicity was expected to be haematological, and a two-step escalation was planned, with and without G-CSF support. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in parallel. In all, 48 patients aged from 1 to 18 years were treated. Dose limiting toxicity was neutropenia for both groups. Maximum tolerated dose was defined as 155 mg m(-2) for Group A and 100 mg m(-2) for Group B. The second phase with G-CSF was interrupted because of evidence of cumulative cardiac toxicity. Cardiac toxicity was reported in a total of 15 patients in this study. DaunoXome shares the early cardiotoxicity of conventional anthracyclines in paediatric oncology. This study has successfully defined a haematological MTD for DaunoXome, but the significance of this is limited given the concerns of delayed cardiac toxicity. The importance of longer-term follow-up in patients enrolled into phase I studies has been underestimated previously, and may lead to an under-recognition of important adverse events.

Pleiotrophin, a candidate gene for poor tumor vasculature and in vivo neuroblastoma sensitivity to irinotecan.

In vivo neuroblastoma (NB) xenograft model, resistant to the DNA-topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11), has been established to study resistance mechanisms acquired in a therapeutic setting. Common mechanisms of resistance were not involved in this resistance. Thus, we compared the gene expression profiles of sensitive, resistant, and reverted tumors using cDNA expression arrays. Expression of selected transcripts was confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. We found that pleiotrophin (PTN), a heparin-binding growth factor, was the only gene significantly affected: PTN gene expression was downregulated in all resistant tumors (8-14-fold) as compared to sensitive tumors, and was increased (2-4-fold) in all reverted tumors as compared to resistant tumors. PTN thus appeared to be a likely candidate gene associated with resistance to CPT-11 in this in vivo model. To investigate the direct implication of PTN in NB, we transfected two NB cell lines with RNA interferences in order to silence PTN. PTN failed to demonstrate implication in resistance to CPT-11 in vitro but could influence sensitivity to CPT-11 exclusively through an in vivo mechanism. Indeed, vasculature was significantly enhanced in resistant NB xenografts compared to sensitive and reverted xenografts, and we suggest that PTN is acting in our resistant in vivo NB model as an angiostatic factor.

[Targeted therapies in pediatric oncology: a new therapeutic approach?]. / Thérapies ciblées en oncologie pédiatrique: nouvelle approche thérapeutique.

A multidisciplinary therapeutic approach has led to significant increase in survival of children with cancer, however often with a high rate of severe sequela. Better understanding in tumor cell biology and transformation process allowed to describe active tyrosine kinases (mainly growth factor receptors) as a new target for cancer treatment. This review presents 2 approaches to target receptor tyrosine kinase activity: on one hand, antibodies that target the extracellular domain, the natural ligand binding site, and on the other hand, small inhibiting molecules, such as imatinib, targeted against the activated intracellular receptor tyrosine kinase. We focus on their clinical development and current application in the treatment of childhood cancer. Targeted therapies are in full rise and new perspectives are explored, such as their association to other treatment modalities and the targeting of microenvironment. This new therapeutic approach necessitates well designed clinical trials that include relevant biomarkers to evaluate its real therapeutic potential.

Dose finding and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase study of cisplatin combined with temozolomide in paediatric solid malignancies.

Cisplatin may have additive activity with temozolomide due to ablation of the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT). This phase I/II study determined recommended combination doses using the Continual Reassessment Method, toxicities and antitumour activity in paediatric patients, and evaluated MGMT in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in order to correlate with haematological toxicity. In total, 39 patients with refractory or recurrent solid tumours (median age approximately 13 years; 14 pretreated with high-dose chemotherapy, craniospinal irradiation, or having bone marrow involvement) were treated with cisplatin, followed the next day by oral temozolomide for 5 days every 4 weeks at dose levels 80 mg m(-2)/150 mg m(-2) day(-1), 80/200, and 100/200, respectively. A total of 38 patients receiving 113 cycles (median 2, range 1-7) were evaluable for toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity was haematological in all but one case. Treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, nausea-vomiting, asthenia. Hearing loss was experienced in five patients with prior irradiation to the brain stem or posterior fossa. Partial responses were observed in two malignant glioma, one brain stem glioma, and two neuroblastoma. Median MGMT activity in PBMCs decreased after 5 days of temozolomide treatment: low MGMT activity correlated with increased severity of thrombocytopenia. Cisplatin-temozolomide combinations are well tolerated without additional toxicity to single-agent treatments; the recommended phase II dosage is 80 mg m(-2) cisplatin and 150 mg m(-2) x 5 temozolomide in heavily treated, and 200 mg m(-2) x 5 temozolomide in less-heavily pretreated children.